[ SECRET POST #3970 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3970 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #568.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: The secret poster didn't say anything about characterization.

[(Anonymous)]

I guess it seems to me that you shouldn't consider the outfit without also considering the characterization, because they're so intimately linked.

Re: The secret poster didn't say anything about characterization.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I see your point, but I think the whimsicality and quirkiness that they seem to be trying for here could be conveyed with different sorts of outfits, so I see the secret poster's point, too.

Re: The secret poster didn't say anything about characterization.

[(Anonymous)]

I think that's overstating things. I certainly wouldn't argue that dismissing the outfit = dismissing the character.

Re: The secret poster didn't say anything about characterization.

[(Anonymous)]

But the character might potentially provide necessary context for the outfit.