[ SECRET POST #3970 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3970 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #568.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[(Anonymous)]

So? Who cares what some stupid critic site rated a film at? Love it, if you want to love it. I know I plan to.

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[(Anonymous)]

Well, Rotten Tomatoes is a critic aggregate site, which means that they take a lot of the critics reviews to give a movies its rating. But of the reason Rotten Tomatoes was significant is that they were holding the rating back and they are partially owned by Warner Brothers. Of course, it could go up as more critics review. Or it could go down. On the other hand, the audience seems to have liked it.