case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-11-19 03:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #3973 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3973 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #569.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-11-20 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Really? That's the reply you're going with? Ugh.

-10000

(Anonymous) 2017-11-20 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
What else is there to say to someone who posts a two-paragraph reply doubling down on their very narrow interpretation of a previous post just to maintain the perception that they're right? Not worth it.

I can hardly speak for the original person, so I can't be 100% certain that I'm right in their meaning either, for that matter. I still think the second anon is reading too much into the statement and turned a teasing reply into an unnecessary argument rather than admit that they might have reached a bit.

But ugh! If not continuing that argument cost me 10000 imaginary internet points...

(Anonymous) 2017-11-20 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Now who's reading too much into it?