[ SECRET POST #3979 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3979 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #570.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Why should the fact that some people can afford to make if for free preclude others from selling theirs, though? I'm interested in you answering my original question. Do you think freely distributing someone else's hard work that they are trying to make a living from - without their knowledge or consent - is morally permissable, or not?

[(Anonymous)]

Oh no, you're misunderstanding my point. If you can find buyers, then that's great. My point is that if someone doesn't think your work is worth their money, or cannot provide the money due to their financial situation, then you're losing literally nothing if they make an exact copy of your work for their personal use. Especially if there's a million of completely legal places which offer the kind of services/products you provide for free anyway.

[(Anonymous)]

sa

tl;dr my point is that whether OP gets your book from a library or a torrent site makes zero difference to your financial situation, so it's unreasonable to approve of one source, but not the other.

[(Anonymous)]

Many libraries buy in their books. Authors get royalties from them.

[(Anonymous)]

How common is that?

[(Anonymous)]

Perfectly common. How else do you think they get them? Public Lending Right also exist. And libraries feed stats back to publishers, who may use that data when deciding whether to extend an author's contract.

[(Anonymous)]

da

Libraries buy books, and the circulation numbers of those books are one of the factors looked at by the publishing companies determining whether or not they're going to publish that next book. So no, it's not unreasonable to approve of the method that actually has some benefit for the author, and disapprove of stealing.

[(Anonymous)]

Pirates buy books too, and there's no reason why the publisher couldn't get the number of downloads and feature it in their calculations.

[(Anonymous)]

A lot of publishers are surprisingly old fashioned. They are not going to trawl multiple dodgy download sites looking for numbers. If they want stats of circulation not directly affected by them, they will look to libraries, not a load of (by their very nature) hard to find and navigate free download pages.

[(Anonymous)]

But when you're talking writing, there aren't going to be "a million of completely legal places which offer the kind of services/products you provide for free". That's your work. Your writing. No one just happened to come up with the exact same novel with the exact same wording and offer it for free by chance. They took your work and used it without your consent.

And if you're talking other kinds of goods and services, how do you feel about patents? Are they useless too? Is design in the same box as writing?

[(Anonymous)]

I meant libraries.

[(Anonymous)]

Then people like OP can take advantage of those millions of completely legal places that offer stuff for free instead of pirating things.

[(Anonymous)]

If those legal places are available 2h drive from them, why should they bother?

[(Anonymous)]

Why should they BOTHER? Because it's what's right! You sound like such an asshole wording stuff like that. Do you actually care about anyone other the yourself?

[(Anonymous)]

I fail to see how it's anyone else's problem that they live in the middle of nowhere that's two hours from a public library.

[(Anonymous)]

Wtf? What if they don't live there by choice? What if they have to spend all of their free time looking after another family member, instead of running off to the library whenever they feel like it?

But sure, screw their family. Following the law to a tee is surely more important.