[ SECRET POST #3983 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3983 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #570.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thewakokid]

But 1) that act of talking about and publishing their opinions is an act. A weak act that is easily countered by someone opposing their view publishing their opinion. And 2) even then the fact is Fox can publish opinion, which can influence others, but even then no harm is actually done until someone decides to act on it.

Also, if you believe there are Bad opinions, you presumably believe there are also Good opinions? What makes it good? Because it's just as capable of leading to harm. A good opinion can be divisive and can lead someone to commit a bad action.

[(Anonymous)]

So if expressing that opinion through speech or writing is an act, and acts can be defined as good or bad, then the only way opinions can remain value-neutral is to keep them to yourself. I’m glad we’re on the same page.

[thewakokid]

Sneaky sneaky. Acts can be good or bad or neutral. Opinions - the think we're arguing about - can only be neutral.