case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-12-07 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #3991 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3991 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Fall]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Louisa May Alcott, Little Men]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Winona Ryder, Jennifer Connelly]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Marvel Comics]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Shetland]


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #571.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - this is not really the place for blind items ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
belladonna_took: richard armitage (Default)

[personal profile] belladonna_took 2017-12-08 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
I'd call what you're talking about "speaking to". Speaking to and calling out have different meanings to me. Speaking to someone would be polite and done out of concern - which would be fine. Calling someone out on their behaviour wouldn't be as polite. You call someone out on their bullshit. It's not something that's appropriate in that situation, IMO.

Might just be one of those weird region-specific sayings that have different meanings in different places?

(Anonymous) 2017-12-08 10:36 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt - Wait, you think they should be *polite* about criminal stalking and harassment? What fucking planet do you come from?

(Anonymous) 2017-12-08 07:31 pm (UTC)(link)
The one where Police officers act like professionals, not vigilantes?
belladonna_took: richard armitage (Default)

[personal profile] belladonna_took 2017-12-08 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. I don't think it's within the bounds of their job to show contempt for criminals. It's unprofessional and they're going to meet a lot of them and be involved in some very tense and upsetting situations. I'd argue it's pretty important for any cop to be able to keep a cool head and be able to engage in a professional and appropriate dialogue with any member of the public, no matter what behaviour they're displaying.

I've met some very professional cops and some very unprofessional ones, and I know which kind make me feel safer.

(Anonymous) 2017-12-08 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I get what you're saying. Cops have to toe the line when it comes to how they use their authority and how they act when they're in uniform. It's much more restrictive than an average any man can act in a situation. In an ideal world its to prevent abuse of power but I'm sure a lot of times it means they have to muzzle their personal opinions/reactions/judgements on situations even when clearly if they were off hours they'd be able to be more free about how they express it. In a very, very small way its the same way anyone in retail or food or customer service has to guideline how they react to people when they're on the job.
belladonna_took: richard armitage (Default)

[personal profile] belladonna_took 2017-12-08 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
That's what I was trying to say, and you explained it a lot better than I could.

It's got to be really difficult to see a situation like that and have to keep their interactions professional, but I think it's a pretty important part of their job.