case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-12-12 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #3996 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3996 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #572.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Or they like AUs.

(Anonymous) 2017-12-14 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt

They won't be the exact same person, but that doesn't mean they can't be in-character. If they have the same personality traits and similar behaviors to a point in canon, that's in-character. The Dean at the start of Supernatural is not the same person as the Dean now, but he is the same character. Background and experience do inform the person that someone becomes, but not all of a person's personality comes from those things. And traits that do come from background and experience can also come from different backgrounds and experiences. Fiction characters are constructed people and I believe that a writer can use a different construction to get them to the same place emotionally, behaviorally, and personality-wise. But if you don't believe that, then alright, those type of AUs won't be anything you're interested in.