[ SECRET POST #3997 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3997 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 2]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Neil Gaiman, Good Omens]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Tonya Harding, Nancy Kerrigan / I, Tonya]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #572.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ninety6tears]

LOL, ok. If they actually meant "meticulous CG has a differently styled lack of realism" hopefully they'll be along to clarify.

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt but... isn't that true? Something can be obviously CGI and not real but still amazingly well done, just like how something can be a real, hand built set or prop but still look like crap. OP doesn't look like they're complaining about there being CGI or unrealistic special effects, they're complaining about poorly done CGI and special effects.

[ninety6tears]

It may be true, but I just don't get that from the secret, which paired "plastic" with "cheap" when obviously "plastic" was the look that scene was going for. And nothing that I said implied that I thought they were complaining about the decision to use CGI rather than the quality of it.