case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-12-21 07:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #4005 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4005 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Rhys Ifans and Richard Armitage in Berlin Station]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #573.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-12-22 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
OP's secret said that Agent Scully > Disney Princesses. Anon's reply (pretty clearly IMO) said that neither of those things is better than the other, they're just intended for different audiences.

Now, obviously, you can agree or disagree with that, the same way that you can agree or disagree that torture is better than lasagna. What's weird and confusing is that you keep approaching it like you don't understand what anon meant with their initial reply, and responding like anon's post didn't make sense, when it was pretty obvious and straightforward.

(Anonymous) 2017-12-22 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
/shrug I think it's possible - highly probable even - that OP knows that Disney princesses and X-Files were intended for different audiences, and yet it's not unreasonable for OP to hold the opinion that one is better than the other. To me, it's weird that the anon I responded to thinks that it's not possible to prefer one thing more than another unless they're the same type of thing. That's pretty silly.