[ SECRET POST #4011 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4010 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #574.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

you had bullshit from Johnson that there's no point if there's no romance

i mean, that's a shitty way to phrase it for sure, but i can see the point in the sense that it can be a tricky thing to signify

[cbrachyrhynchos]

It takes about the same storyboard beats as communicating Rose's relationship with her sibling. Star Trek: Beyond spent a bit less time on Sulu's marriage. Both Last Jedi and Beyond take advantage of decades of war-movie signification to communicate those relationships in as few frames as possible.

Honestly, I don't expect LGBTQ characters in every movie. (Actually, I do, I'm just used to reading them into the background.) But saying that you can't do anything without a primary on-screen romance is setting the bar arbitrarily high.

[(Anonymous)]

I can see where you're coming from, but I can also see how someone would say that the way that they did Sulu's marriage in Beyond was a little awkward in the mechanics of how it was done. It's still better to do it, obviously, but there is an awkwardness. It's a heteronormativity thing, I expect.