case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-01-08 08:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #4023 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4023 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #576.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-01-09 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
It isn't that Dan's bad habits aren't depicted as bad, but they're depicted as being more excusable than Nat's bad habits and I mean... come on. He had far more serious issues as a boy - lying, stealing, drinking, gambling, for starters. He physically attacked one of Jo's stepsons and encouraged the other kids to beat on each other for fun. It's great that he reforms over time, but how is all of THAT better than being easily led? And how is it Nat's fault that he's not "spirited"?