[ SECRET POST #4038 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4038 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.

__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #578.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Is there no middle ground between analytical/reasoned critique and an attempt to start wank?

[(Anonymous)]

"Attempt" to start wank implies intent, and intent is tricky to argue about. But certainly, I think there are topics where a reasonable person familiar with the fandom (as OP professes to be) should know and expect that posting a strong, unnuanced take is going to cause wank. And on that level, in terms of reasonable expectation of wank rather than intent, I'm not sure that there is a middle ground.

[(Anonymous)]

Then perhaps you are not as familiar with fandom as you profess to be.

[(Anonymous)]

I really don't understand what you're driving at, but ok.