[ SECRET POST #4040 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4040 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #578.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Genetic Tests

[cbrachyrhynchos]

For one thing, few countries in Europe are homogeneous populations so putting a percentage on an identifier like "British Isles" vs. "Scandinavian" vs. "French" vs. "German" doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Most whites in England will have Scandinavian markers, because England is named after its Scandinavian settlers. And I really doubt that they're shipping with 100-odd pages of technical documentation to say what those numbers really mean.

And 1% - 3%? That's an error bar. Are you 1% Polynesian because you had a Polynesian ancestor seven generations ago, or are you 1% Polynesian because their sample of living Polynesians includes post-colonial and global genetic relationships, or are you 1% Polynesian because those companies want to flatter you and reporting spurious correlations can do that?