case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-01-29 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #4044 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4044 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #579.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 06:49 am (UTC)(link)
Okay so why are hets allowed to have their hot young pretty couples? Suddenly our LGBT ship is invalid because it involves two hot guys? Also that's inaccurate considering I've seen some "non-sexy" slash ships get hugely popular like Clint/coulson, johnlock, will/Hannibal, or almost any walking dead ship you can think of.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2018-01-30 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Straight people get likable characters from teens to senior citizens. Part of having "representation" includes characters who are not sexy or shippable, and being a part of (or ally to) LGBTQ communities include supporting people who don't turn you on. Fandom doesn't get to claim magical ally cookies if its advocacy includes all the same problems with race, age, and body image that are already problems within LGBTQ communities.

While those ships are not my thing, all are backed by a fair degree of personal attraction for them. I wouldn't call johnlock "non-sexy" given how many former and current cumberbitches are running around.
Edited 2018-01-30 12:28 (UTC)