[ SECRET POST #4047 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4047 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02. https://i.imgur.com/X94vZlP.jpg
[linked at OP's request for pics of raw meat and stuff]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #579.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Photoshop is nowhere near the same thing. People know about editing programs for awhile, anyone can mess around with it. Convincing video manips are much more recent and were probably more difficult to create.

It's harder to tell if it's fake unless you know the source of the porn or if the actor/actress has to deny it. They shouldn't have to go that far.

[(Anonymous)]

Have you actually heard what celebrities are saying about photo manips? Tom Felton said many times that he had to deny to his friends and family that some of the raunchy Drarry manips are real. I've also read an article about famous twin celebrities who had to face accusations of incest after smutty photo manips with them appeared online.

How can you defend that, while hating the same thing? Is it because we are used to photo manips in fandom, but no so much to vido manips?

[(Anonymous)]

... but couldn't people have said exactly the same thing about photoshop back in the day? That it was more recent and more difficult to create than say, messing around with film?