[ SECRET POST #4048 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4048 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Transformers]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Boku no Hero Academia]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Star Wars: The Last Jedi]


__________________________________________________




















05. [SPOILER for The Shape of Water]
[WARNING for gore and animal cruelty]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILER for Assassination Classroom]
[WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for incest (and underage?)]

[Chronicles of Narnia, Peter/Susan]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harrassment]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #579.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: disagreed

[maximumhusky]

"I'm NOT saying what Louis CK did wasn't awful. But it seems more pathetic than threatening."

This is the part where I want to jump in, and say that it actually was an issue, not merely as harmless as OP makes it out to be.

". . . and that you're not just bringing up highly improbably scenarios to better virtue signal how so very woke you are . . ."

But everything else confuses me on what OP is trying to say. I think OP did make a toss at mentioning people's livelihoods riding on an abuser's goodwill, but I'm questioning what's making them throw in this level of defense for Louis CK (the terrible piece of shit that needs to rot already). Who is this line aimed for? Does anybody discuss Louis CK outside of the news reports of what happened? I don't see much discussion on him beyond that.

Re: disagreed

[(Anonymous)]

I mean. It says right there in the secret. It's aimed at people who make a big fuss over saying how they wouldn't want to be in the same room with him (with the implication that he's a dangerous sexual predator vs. a pathetic sack of shit) because that seems to be more about loudly declaring your disapproval for everyone to hear than anything else. Or at least that's what I get, directly from the text of the secret itself.

Re: disagreed

[(Anonymous)]

evidently people did proclaim it enough to annoy op. why do people always do this? "i haven't seen it happen so it can't be happening" is not very solid.

anyway op literally acknowledges and excludes female comedians in their secret