[ SECRET POST #4049 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4049 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thewakokid]

Well it means that the government has only two choices, then doesn't it? Their statement means that the government needs to either stop recognising marriage at all for straight people or gay, or legalise it for everyone. It is a bit of a fence-sitty poition, but it's a fence the government can't afford to sit on. They can't un-recognise straight marriage, so by default it means they have to recognise gay marriage. I'd call the libertarian idea a valid support for gay marriage.

[philstar22]

But the federal government still laws on marriage issues. No incest, no bigamy, no child marriage. So unless they are suggesting they'd be okay with all those laws removed, which is kind of gross at least with the last one, then they aren't really being consistent with their own philosophy.