Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-02-03 04:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #4049 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4049 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Help me get a sense of perspective on this
(Anonymous) 2018-02-03 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)I eventually watched the remake of the movie. Love Van Hellsing (also part of Universal's stuff) and there are several other Univeral made werewolf movies I've enjoyed. (Universal seems to have most the rights.)
The thing I found about werewolves is that they aren't as culturally popular and focused as vampires! There are too many diverse iterations of how they exist, what their curse/disease is like and how it all goes terribly wrong. (You've got werewolves, lycanthropes, the loup garou and dogmen at the least in folk lore.) Nothing really gelled together like Dracula did for vampires to push them into public consciousness.
So, even if you are into monster stuff, I wouldn't expect them to know about the character of that particular werewolf movie, or the movie that actually came before it from Universal that was a science gone wrong werewolf movie. The lore and the media is just too scattered for that.