[ SECRET POST #4049 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4049 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[were_lemur]

WTF?

I mean.

They were grown-ass adults when they met. Not even straight-out-of-high-school-yeah-they-can-legally-vote-but-are-still-teenagers adults, but actual living-on-their-own functional adults.

And how is it only pedophilia if one of them is topping and not if the other one is topping?

And I thought the Wincest "who tops" ship war was batshit!

[(Anonymous)]

To my awareness, no one ever actually said it was pedophilia if Sherlock topped. What happened was that a chunk of fandom really disliked the trend where Sherlock was written as this dark, sociopathic sex god who used and abused John to no end and John was his helpless little minion and sex slave. (They invented the term Dark Fuck Prince to describe this trope.) But over time, a small subset of the people who disliked DFP!Sherlock ended up becoming more extreme in their preferences, and so they became full-on anti Top!Sherlock. Not because it was pedophilia, but because they just didn't like Top!Sherlock.

Meanwhile, a couple of BNFs who went in super hard on Dark Fuck Prince Sherlock ALSO had a tendency of writing and/or drawing underage John being fucked or raped by DFP Sherlock.

And the people who hated Dark Fuck Prince Sherlock were largely the SAME people who were involved in the noncon/pedo wank that occurred around the same time. So there were a small number of people accusing Toplockers of being pedophiles. But they weren't saying, "You're a pedo because you like toplock." They were saying, "You're a pedo because you draw fanart of a very underage John being raped by DFP!Sherlock."

I don't agree with the behavior of the people doing the accusing. And the Sherlock fandom was a wanky mess, no argument there. But in my experience, people were not calling toplock pedophilia. People were calling a very specific and often shota-ish subset of toplock pedophilia.