[ SECRET POST #4049 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4049 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: How detailed do you get when tagging smut?

[were_lemur]

If there's something in there that's likely to be someone's kink or squick, I'll tag for that. People who don't like it can avoid it, people who are looking for it can find it, everybody wins.

I was kind of weirded out when I first discovered that Supernatural fandom was so insistent on labeling who's on the top, but I've since come to appreciate its role in minimizing my chances of coming across dewy-eyed uke!Sam.