[ SECRET POST #4049 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4049 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: How detailed do you get when tagging smut?

[(Anonymous)]

I tag for acts that I think people are into, and that's the only reason. And even then, I don't tag for everything. Like, if I'm writing about het sex, I don't think woman on top is something that would be unexpected so I don't tag for that. It's just a PIV position. Kitchen sex or shower sex or office sex I might tag for if it's a significant focal point, because while I would expect there to be some variety of PIV, sex in alternative locations is a kink that might need advertised.

With gay porn do get really specific with acts just because anal has a bigger reputation for being something that not all gay people are into and again the idea is to get people to things they want to read.