case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-05 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #4051 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4051 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Stranger Things spoilers

(Anonymous) 2018-02-06 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
I... maybe I'm blind/innocent, but I really feel like you have to be looking at it from that angle in the first place to see all of that...

Re: Stranger Things spoilers

(Anonymous) 2018-02-06 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Nayrt but butting in to say, you not noticing something doesn't make it somehow not intentionally subtextual. A lot of narrative subtext works whether or not the audience notices it, so I've always found the "It's only you looking for it!" knee-jerk rebuttal pretty ridiculous.