Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-02-11 02:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #4057 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4057 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: ??
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 01:04 am (UTC)(link)I do not care who tops.
I do not care who bottoms.
I do not care if my OTP kiss without one asking the other if it's ok first.
I do not care about noncon tickling.
I do not care if they have sex when they're both a little drunk.
I have experience with sexual assault, and I have experience with the slow death of a parent to disease when I was young. You know, the real and serious shit that content warnings EXIST FOR, because it can be triggering, or, even if it's not triggering, it's just not the shit you want to read in your downtime. I do not enjoy noncon or slow character death at all. I think it's great that most people in fandom (disregarding F!S, apparently) consider it standard to warn for those things, or at least warn that there are things they are not warning for. That's really nice. It makes reading fic in a fandom with a lot of both those tropes much, much easier and more enjoyable. That's why AO3 supplies certain stock warning tags. Because they're the things large numbers of people are likely to want warnings for. How you got from there to "Tagging for Bottom!Dean is mandatory!" is just mind boggling to me.