fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #4057 ]

[ SECRET POST #4057 ]

⌈ Secret Post #4057 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I think you're right. There's a lot of anger in this thread and it feels like way more than makes sense in response to to the things I've said.

It's actually why I didn't make this a secret myself. Because I know F!S, and I know how many people here are essentially hostile to the idea of things being triggering (unless you are literally Ex-army and can show a recording of yourself having a flashback or something), and also hostile to warnings, and who also just generally dislike tags in any capacity.

But once the secret was posted and it was obviously essentially mine (though not quite how I would've phrased it), I was like, welp, guess I'm gonna argue with F!S today. Lol.

I don't see a lot of hostility to the concept of things being triggering. It's mostly hostility to the concept that everyone should share your weird ideas of what the CNTW tag means.

I don't see a lot of hostility to the concept of things being triggering.

Literally the first comment in the thread is calling people who want warnings for triggers whiny-ass crybabies

And that means everyone except you agrees with that person?

No, it means that there's some hostility in the thread towards the concept of things being triggering.

So you believe that actually a lot (as opposed to not a lot) of people in this thread are hostile towards the concept of things being triggering?

I could see where someone could get that impression.

People in this thread aren't irritated at you because they think warnings are horrible. They're irritated at you because you're looking at someone saying "Hey, guys, I don't use warnings, so read my stuff at your own risk" and responding with "But why aren't there any warnings?"

I think AYRT is right in saying that the anger seems disproportionate, though. It definitely reads that way to me.

what does this even mean

It feels to me that many of the posts in this thread are more angry than is warranted by things that OP said. In other words, the amount of anger seems disproportionate to the thing that is causing it.

This whole pseudo-OP thing you're doing is weird.

NAYRT

I kind of take it at face value?

It happens pretty frequently that someone grabs something from the comments and turns it into a secret. It's not even the only secret today that this is true of. So I'm not sure what's so weird about it.

Wait, so are we talking to the person the secret was quoting?

That is my understanding of the situation, yes.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[ SECRET POST #4057 ]

OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP

Re: OP