Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-02-11 02:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #4057 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4057 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 03:25 am (UTC)(link)I should have put ideological disagreement first and angry second, because I think that's much closer to how it actually functions.
And I'm not saying that Choose Not To Warn isn't a valid warning. I'm saying that people who use it across the board and generically, in the way that OP is talking about, are often motivated by a disagreement with the basic idea of warnings or with the way that they're used in practice. As a way of saying "I'm not going to warn for anything specific so consider yourself preemptively warned for everything", often because either you don't think you should have to warn for things or you think that the way people approach warnings is bad (because they ask for warnings for too many things, for instance). So that's what I'm getting at when I say ideological disagreement.
And then, when it comes to anger - I don't think that everyone is angry about it but IME there are a lot of people who get all heated up about warnings. And if I didn't already think that was the case, this thread would certainly be a dang example.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 03:34 am (UTC)(link)