[ SECRET POST #4062 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4062 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Danny Elfman]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________





















07. [SPOILERS for Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency Season 2]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for The Shape of Water]
[WARNING for discussion of rape/non-con]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, but what do you mean when you say that OP "doesn't want Mike and Eleven to fuck any time in the next 6 years"? Cause they're fictional characters.

Are you saying that OP doesn't want fanworks to depict the fictional characters of Mike and Eleven having a sexual relationship at any point over the next 6 years? Are you saying that OP doesn't want the characters to have a sexual relationship at any point over the next 6 years, regardless of how it's depicted? Or are you saying that OP wouldn't want real people who were the same ages as Mike and Eleven to have a sexual relationship at any point over the next 6 years? Or some combination of the above?

[(Anonymous)]

All of the above? You're putting way too much thought into this.

[(Anonymous)]

Where does OP say anything about their opinions on minors having sex with other minors IRL?

[(Anonymous)]

It's logical assumption though admittedly not relevant to the actual secret. But I'm not the one who brought it up so...

[(Anonymous)]

Well, first of all, you were the one who brought it up.

Second, how is it a logical assumption? Even when talking about fictional characters, OP talks about 2 things that they object to: (1) shipping adults with minors, and (2) shipping minors with minors for your own sick amusement. Neither of those is about relationships between minors being wrong in and of themselves.

[(Anonymous)]

I brought it up? Where the fuck did I bring it up until AIRT mentioned it?