[ SECRET POST #4066 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4066 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #582.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think you might be confusing two different arguments about tagging?

There was one argument about someone saying that they don't tag at all, which I think is where a lot of the arguments about tagging being advertising came into it, and then the other was (IIRC) a very long and involved argument about when it was appropriate to use the Choose Not To Warn tag. And I think the latter is where the conversation OP is talking about happened.

[liz_marcs]

Hmmm, okay. This is a point. I was thinking tagging specific warnings, as opposed to tagging specific story elements as advertising.

I'm approaching it from a warning perspective like the AYRT.

But you're definitely right. In systems where you need to tag just to be seen I've certainly tagged freely and widely about pairing, story type, etc., using the drop-down tags.