case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-20 06:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #4066 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4066 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #582.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Nope. You don't get to just throw out names when engaging in a discussion. Other SJ activists are not your meat shield against criticism, nor do they make you right. In the end, you can't explain your own argument.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2018-02-21 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
Fact 1: Not all trans people who experience dysphoria wish to fully transition to the "opposite" medical, legal, and/or social gender.

Fact 2: The people who coined both "nonbinary" and "genderqueer" in the 1990s were trans activists describing Fact 1 among their own communities.

Follow so far?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
google is so easy, dumbass. this person doesnt owe you a lesson in transness when you could easily look up some of the names they mentioned and educate your damn self and use critical thinking to reach your own conclusions like a normal fucking adult lol.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
You can't not bring a plate and expect your discussion partner to spoon feed you. Do your own research that is debate 101 ffs

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Lol at the replies to this. You have every right to question their non-response. Acting supercilious while throwing out a bunch of names is not a satisfactory answer, and nor is saying, "Do your own research."

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
trying to be critical of something when you lack the most basic knowledge of it is also not fantastic

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
"Do your own research" is an EXACTLY satisfactory argument, partly because the person might actually learn something instead of constantly arguing the toss from a position of utter ignorance

Wanna talk about lol? Lol at your entitled assholishness.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-22 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
It isn't satisfactory when you'd rather learn from the person you're discussing it with.