case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-25 03:56 pm

[ SECRET POST #4071 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4071 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #583.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Troll alert.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-26 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
1. Has anyone in this thread actually done that? No? How is this relevant again?

2. Again, my point is that I'm not calling troll because I'm disputing facts. I'm calling troll because the inflammatory language feels very deliberate and trollish to me.

3. Your response is not a strong argument against trolls. See #2.

Re: Troll alert.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-26 06:03 am (UTC)(link)
It's relevant because I don't feel that the "militant vegetarian" anon was any more inflammatory than the anon who brought up their inability to properly absorb nutrients from plants. Unless you consider any mention of vegetarianism inflammatory, in which case that says more about you than about the anon you're calling a troll.