[ SECRET POST #4073 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4073 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #583.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's not "keeping score" it's disagreeing with someone who said "nobody of the other side here was posting assholish comments" which simply isn't true.
It's ridiculous that you accuse me of the exact same thing you do yourself. Get your head out of your own ass and practise what you preach, how about it?

[(Anonymous)]

And I'm out. This is too ridiculous.

[cbrachyrhynchos]

Let's be clear about this, you're trying to play gotcha on the fact that an unidentified and anonymous person has not equally addressed unspecified, uncited, unquoted, and unlinked "assholish" comments by unidentified and anonymous persons who, nevertheless are on the "other side." This is a classic tu quoque, made even more ridiculous by the fact that none of the parties or posts in question have been identified beyond mere innuendo.

It's not the same thing at all to point out that your stated argument is bullshit.

[(Anonymous)]

As long as you believe in it and it makes you happy.

[(Anonymous)]

it's disagreeing with someone who said "nobody of the other side here was posting assholish comments" which simply isn't true.

I never said that. I said that your comment was much more assholish. That none of the comments were as assholish as your comment. Because you said that the movie was objectively bad and that you have to be dumb to think that it was good.

[(Anonymous)]

Only I didn't say that. I said that there are things that generally can be considered bad writing and that the people who say "you're just too dumb to get it" might be the dumb ones for being so overly impressed by not very well executed twists.

[(Anonymous)]

You're the one who talked about "objectively bad writing" and you're the one who said that "Just because you are dumb enough to find a contrived "twist" that's just there for shock value omg such great writing, much clever! doesn't mean everyone has to she your thoughts."

[(Anonymous)]

I only did that in response to some other anon who brought this up in the first place!
But whatever. I'm out.