[ SECRET POST #4090 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4090 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Reylo]


__________________________________________________



03.
[black panther, martin freeman]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Colm Wilkinson and Philip Quast in Les Mis 10th anniversary concert]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Doug Jones]


__________________________________________________



06. https://i.imgur.com/UETD1MW.png
[linked for nudity]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #585.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

To be fair, magical talent isn't necessarily one of the main things you'd look for in a teacher of magic. I mean, you'd want somebody who's actually competent in the field, absolutely (as opposed to, say, Lockhart), but having somebody who's good at the kind of magic they teach doesn't actually guarantee they'll be a good teacher. Look at Snape. By all accounts an excellent potions master and a spectacular dark arts master and defender, but because of his personality and circumstances also a truly abysmal teacher. Dumbledore as well, though one of the most powerful wizards of his age, was a pretty dodgy teacher/headmaster too, given that his mindset was mired rather firmly in war and the past, and he generally had a lot more success raising soldiers than things like easing school divides or dealing consistently with the student body as a whole. It also doesn't help that he seems to have filled out his teaching roster as much to have a war-ready staff as to have a competent teaching staff. See: Snape, particularly, Lupin as well, probably Trelawny to an extent. McGonagal had the happy bonus of being a war-ready witch as well as being a dang good teacher.

So, I don't know. I think Harry probably could be a pretty decent teacher if it was a field he was interested in. He doesn't have a lot of patience to grind work, which might be a problem for him, but he actually is very good at working with people and teaching them things in a way that doesn't scare the shit out of them or have them wind up in a bathroom crying. Hermione ... might not be quite so good at that part. She has a lot of patience for magic, but she doesn't always have the same patience for people.

[dreamingofcats]

ITA with everything you've said (particularly about Dumbledore focusing more on creating soldiers and preparing for war), but it's funny to me that this whole thread is about Harry's academic prowess or lack thereof and how it would impact his teaching, when flying instructor is a job that exists at Hogwarts and is right up his alley.