case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-03-16 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #4090 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4090 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Reylo]


__________________________________________________



03.
[black panther, martin freeman]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Colm Wilkinson and Philip Quast in Les Mis 10th anniversary concert]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Doug Jones]


__________________________________________________



06. https://i.imgur.com/UETD1MW.png
[linked for nudity]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #585.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-17 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

I think probably that was the director's intention.

I guess my problem is that I think it should have been more explicit. In particular, it just feels like... in US media, just because you show something that's clearly evil being done by a security agency, it doesn't therefore follow that you're criticizing the institution. The depictions of those institutions in American media, and the elisions and moral double standards that they usually involve, are just so commonplace. It's dangerous to let something speak for itself in a context that's so distorted already. I just really think that's something that you need to be slightly more explicit about.