case: ([ Kyouya; Eh? ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-07-17 05:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #559 ]


⌈ Secret Post #559 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170.


__________________________________________________



171.


__________________________________________________



172.


__________________________________________________



173.


__________________________________________________



174.


__________________________________________________



175.



Notes:

[livejournal.com profile] livelongnmarry - fandom auction type place! For a good cause.
[livejournal.com profile] doctorwhy - A daily webcomic featuring the life and woes of our favourite (tenth regeneration) Time Lord.
[livejournal.com profile] fandom_of_one - An LJ comm for obscure fandoms!

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 82 secrets from Secret Submission Post #080.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 4 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
(deleted comment)

Re: 101

[identity profile] melengro.livejournal.com 2008-07-18 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
I am aware that modern churches are edifices built primarily on coal-fired bullshit.

'The only god' and he can't even breathe on land? These were not sophisticated times.

When you obtain the ability to see the sheer incomprehensible vastness of the universe beyond a narrow triumphalist worldview, and a working knowledge of the history and theory of science and philosophy, you'll understand why I dismiss so-called 'strong atheism' as so much hubristic self-centredness.

And when you stop relying upon anecdotal evidence of individual idiots, and read something that explains the true purpose of prayer (hint: it's not a wish list), and become familiar with the theoretical grounding behind the pronouncements of your Polkinghornes and McCabes and Mertons and Radcliffes, and actually get some grounding in religious theory beyond the useless theories of the fundamentalists and atheists enthralled to the same tiny God, maybe we can get somewhere.
(deleted comment)

Re: 101

[identity profile] melengro.livejournal.com 2008-07-18 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
I think you have an excessively narrow definition of 'evidence.' Anselm destroyed this definition (and all formulations based upon probabilities) with a logic bomb a thousand years ago. Then Kant took out Anselm's arguments until Godel was able to rebuild them mathematically.

The flying spaghetti monster was funnier when it was called the invisible pink unicorn, though not by much.

I think that assuming your senses are automatically accurate without cross-checking them against the accumulated philosophical and theoretical formulations of human civilisation is extremely hubristic, YES, actually!

Stop saying '[my] god,' it's making me nuts.

FOR FUCK'S SAKE, THE COURTIER'S REPLY IS UTTER SHIT! If you are going to argue against anything YOU SHOULD AT LEAST KNOW WHAT PRECISELY YOUR OPPONENTS ARE CLAIMING!! Otherwise you end up looking like somebody who didn't even bother to do any research at all into what precisely religious people think God is and what reasons they have for believing in Ver. PZ Myers, Richard Dawkins et al are an embarrassment to intellectuals in general and atheist intellectuals in particular. I defy them to debate somebody like Radcliffe or McCord Adams without resorting to cheap rhetorical tricks derived from Hans Christien Andersen stories. I could use a laugh.

Re: 101

(Anonymous) 2008-07-18 10:29 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. If the topic angers you this much, perhaps you should take a few steps back before replying and come back to it after you've calmed down a bit.

If you are going to argue against anything YOU SHOULD AT LEAST KNOW WHAT PRECISELY YOUR OPPONENTS ARE CLAIMING!!

What, precisely, are you claiming? All you've basically done here so far is thrown around names and capslock!rage.

Re: 101

[identity profile] meagenimage.livejournal.com 2008-07-18 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
You know you can't actually *convince* someone to believe in God through logic, right?

You can't convince anyone to come over your point of view through logic, period. The only thing you can do is present it as best you can, and let them decide for themselves.

Re: 101

(Anonymous) 2008-07-19 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Our FATHER who art in HEAVEN.

Sky daddy, in short.