case: ([ Byakuran; Superiority. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-07-18 05:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #560 ]


⌈ Secret Post #560 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170.


__________________________________________________



171.


__________________________________________________



172.


__________________________________________________



173.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #080.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - troll ], [ 1 2 - what the heck? ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
(deleted comment)

Re: 117, 123, 144

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2008-07-19 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I never expected you to agree with me about Rose as a character and I wasn't trying to change your opinion on her. But one look at [livejournal.com profile] doctorwho or OG or journalfen will show you how extremely prevalent Rose hate is. Or one look at some of the more prominent (rabid) Martha fen, some of whom spend as much time posting about their hate for Rose as their love for Martha. I won't give names. I never said "they started it," but yes, I do believe "they're just as bad" is a viable argument. If two sides are both doing something equally immature and someone calls you on only holding it against one side? No, sorry. That's not immature. Persecution complex? Okay. Never mind that there was nothing in my comment even indicating being a fan of Rose's character. A non-fan could have just as easily written it.

I'm not saying Doctor/Rose fans can't be totally wanktacular, because they definitely can. But the idea that it's THEM and only them and they're the only ones acting that wanktacular is sort of out there. Even the OP acknowledged the hate from both sides. It's great that you haven't had anything directed at you- I imagine you haven't posted much that would irritate Martha fans, judging by your comments. I've never had unkind comments directed to me by a Martha fan either, or a Rose fan (even though I've disagreed with both at points). But that doesn't mean I haven't seen it happen to plenty of other people. I've just been lucky I guess.
(deleted comment)

Re: 117, 123, 144

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2008-07-19 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
OG= Outpost Gallifrey.

"Yeah, ship wars suck, I've had bad experiences with Rose fans especially"

That's not what you said.

and I don't see that much Rose hate going on, to be honest. I see legitimate criticisms of the character, which Rose fans tend to perceive as "hate".

When people spend more time "criticizing" Rose's character than talking about other subjects, it starts feeling hateful. When I'm reading a meta post on something almost completely unrelated and there are side-swipes and snarks at Rose and her fans all over it, it's obnoxious. You've got the same darn people repeating over and over the same regurgitated Rose hate statements. If you consider the criticism legitimate, fine. I generally don't. When it's done so excessively, especially. I consider it often hypocritical, because they'll praise the same thing in other characters or what have you. You might not consider it bashing (I do), but there is such overwhelming negativity towards her on that community that it's extremely difficult for a fan of hers to even have the thing friended.

I've never seen any "rabid" Martha fans post anything that's unfounded character bashing in [info]doctorwho, and I've been there for some time.

Unfounded character bashing? Well therein might be a problem. If you see the bashing as legit because you feel that way about the character, you're not going to see a problem with it. But it's still hate.

And the mods seem to be pretty on top of bashing there, but it does happen frequently enough before they get around to freezing or deleting the threads. I've seen them freezing more Rose threads than Martha ones recently.

"They're just as bad," is not a viable arguement. When David Berkowitz presented his defense to the court, he didn't say, "Yeah?! Well! Manson is just as bad as me and I don't see you picking on him!".

What. o.o I'm really uncomfortable with comparisons like this, but last time I checked it's not like people ignored Manson's crimes or something. Pointedly, they did "pick on him" and imprison him, justice being served. I don't think your comparison makes sense. Yes, when two people are doing the same thing and you penalize only one of them, that is unfair. Nothing more. Nothing less.


Also, by the way, no, you didn't say you're a Rose fan, but then you've got a lump of Rose icons...


Er, not quite what I was saying. Not saying it wouldn't be easy to find out I was a Rose fan. Obviously yes, one look at my userinfo will tell you I enjoy her character. I was saying my comment itself made no implication of having a persecution complex or what have you and could have just as easily been made by a non-fan.

Done here. Not replying again.
Edited 2008-07-19 21:09 (UTC)