case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-04-01 03:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #4106 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4106 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #588.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-02 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you serious? You can't see the cis woman biology shaming inherent in derailing every conversation about reproductive rights or periods or breastfeeding by jumping in and claiming that calling these things women's rights issues makes you trans-exclusionary? There is a vocal segment of the trans community that likes to dismiss these issues as unimportant because they don't affect them, and unfortunately they use the same language that women hear all the time from politicians who don't think they should have to support some pregnant woman's prenatal care because after all, they can't get pregnant.

So, here's the thing -- if you only care about the parts of women's rights that affect you directly, then you don't care about women's rights. You care about your rights. That doesn't make you less of a woman, but it makes you less of a person.