case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-04-01 03:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #4106 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4106 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #588.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-02 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
And I really don't think that any part of this critique is about shaming women for their biology

That's exactly what it is though? They're now unable to talk about issues that intrinsically only affect those who have these biological traits without getting shouted down by the women who don't share these biological traits. It's no different than the centuries of bullshit and control cis male politicians have had over women's biology. I think it's bullshit that in women-centric circles, you can't even mention vaginas or periods or reproductive rights without getting demonized for not including women with penises.