[ SECRET POST #4108 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4108 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Korg from Thor: Ragnarok]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Knight Squad]


__________________________________________________



05.
(Yellow Diamond from Steven Universe, "What's the Use of Feeling Blue")


__________________________________________________



06.
(the cast from Altered Carbon)


__________________________________________________



07.
(Zimmy, Gunnerkrigg Court)














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #588.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think posting to disagree with a secret is bad

[(Anonymous)]

Civil disagreement is great. Complaining that someone's secret isn't up to your personal standards is a dick move.

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's much harder to distinguish between those two things than you seem to think.

[(Anonymous)]

It really isn't.

[(Anonymous)]

I honestly don't see what's so difficult about it.

"I disagree with this secret because reasons" vs "This secret is stupid and a waste of time. How is this even a secret?"

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt - Right? Like how is that distinction hard in any way?

[(Anonymous)]

What if I say 'I think most people actually agree with you' or 'I think that was actually the point of the movie'?

[(Anonymous)]

Neither of those is an outright complaint about the secret itself, so I'd count them in the civil discussion category.

[(Anonymous)]

As long as those remarks don't come with the snotty implication of "... so why did you bother making this secret", that seems civil enough.