[ SECRET POST #4115 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4115 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #589.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

How the heck does that work.

If you think that it would be a problem if he was out murdering people, then you can't also say that you should separate the art from the artist. If you separate the art from the artist, then it wouldn't matter if he was a mass-murdering kitten eater, because his kitten-eating would still be separate from his art. On the other hand, if there are some things where you can no longer separate the art from the artist, then at that point we're just arguing over where you draw the line.

And I can completely understand why some people might draw the line here. Even if you don't.