case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-04-14 02:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #4119 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4119 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #590.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-15 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Tony's arc was about atoning for what HE ACTUALLY DID either through ignorance or negligence while in a position of power; T'Challa's arc is about dealing with HIS FATHER'S MISTAKE and realizing that he needs to blaze his own path as king

I think this is overstating the difference, by a lot.

With T'Challa, it's not just about his father's error. His father's error is a crystallization of a broader set of problems with the Wakandan way of doing things. And that's a way of doing things that T'Challa has internalized and identified with, and the movie is, in large part, about understanding that those things do have to change.

And then, with Tony, it's not just about what he himself has done while in charge of the company; it's about what the company is and has done and what the Stark name means.

I would say that the Lion King comparisons are way more thematically loose, and much more about generic Hero's Journey stuff. I haven't seen Lion King in years, so I might be off on this, but there's no sense in Lion King - at least as I can recall - of Simba atoning for the sins of his father, or of Mufasa generally being anything other than a righteous king, deposed by treachery. That's a massive, huge, fundamental thematic chasm.

Although I agree that the villains in Iron Man and Black Panther do come at things from a different angle - Stane is a villain who wants to maintain the villainous status quo, Killmonger is a villain who represents the impossibility of maintaining it but goes about changing it in the wrong way.