[ SECRET POST #4131 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4131 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Cardcaptor Sakura, Pokémon Black/White, Sonic the Hedgehog, Lord of the Rings]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
["Babushka Lady", JFK assassination]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Jessica Jones season 2]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Ready Player One]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Great British Bake Off]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #591.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's not as clear cut as you would like to think. I did a bit of research on that because I was surprised that people considered adopted siblings having a sexual relationship as incest.

Turns out, that even if two men are biologically related and having a sexual relationship, for a very long time it didn't count as incest, because there was no vagina involved. It only counted as incest when there was the possibility for offspring.

And that's so not the weirdest definition I found, too.

[philstar22]

Well, then, all the more reason to tag if someone could consider it incest. There are a lot of possible definitions, and there is a possibility of someone being triggered by relationships that fall under any of the definitions. When in doubt, you should tag.

[tree_and_leaf]

It's not how I'd define it, but it still makes a certain amount of sense, because a lot of the anxiety about incest or quasi incest (particularly in a situation like this one, where they're cousins rather than siblings or parent/child or uncle/ nephew) and weren't raised together IS about the additional genetic risks to any offspring. It's a bit like how the definition of adultery in English law still involves penis-in-vagina intercourse, so cheating with someone of the same sex doesn't count as adultery for the purposes of the divorce courts.* Laws around sex were often framed by people who were most worried about children and being able to clearly establish whose they were.

* I mean, you could still get a divorce on grounds of unreasonable behaviour, so it doesn't make all that much difference in practice, but it's still weird.