[ SECRET POST #4136 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4136 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 23 secrets from Secret Submission Post #592.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Anyone calling Jurassic Park nuanced deserves to be laughed at.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

The original at least had sympathetic people making bad decisions, or disagreeing with bad decisions but being seduced by the allure of having power over the animals nonetheless, etc. Jurassic World was obviously blaring from the beginning who was going to be a victim of hubris and made it all too heavy-handed who we were supposed to like or dislike.

Re: Anyone calling Jurassic Park nuanced deserves to be laughed at.

[philstar22]

Funnily enough, the book was much more like Jurassic World in that sense. The Jurassic Park movie made Hammond much more sympathetic (a lot of that had to do with casting the role first and then having to alter it) than he ever was in the book.