Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-05-06 03:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #4141 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4141 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #593.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)(I wonder if I should admit that I have actually used 'vertiginous' before, because it's a nice big word for 'terrifyingly steep' that slightly distracts you from the fact that the thing is, in fact, terrifyingly steep)
(I've also seen probity before, because I read that kind of fantasy book as a teenager, but it's been so long that I had to look it back up)
What is this book about, by the way? A really pale and surprisingly moral Great White shark looking down a very steep cliff into a primordial abyss?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)Agreeing with above commenter on vertiginous, but I've never heard the others.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)knowing most people won't know what certain words mean and choosing other, more readily understood synonyms in a medium meant to communicate ideas to people at large for the sake of storytelling is wisdom
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I had to look up 'apocatastatis,' though, and I guess I can see why using restoration isn't quite adequate.
ETA: Is this book first person POV? Because I could certainly see such a vocabulary being used to develop a character voice (albeit an exhausting one) and convey various qualities (intellect, well-read, precise, pompous, etc.)
OP
(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 12:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 12:44 am (UTC)(link)I'm very sorry for your fandom. These people must be insufferable.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 01:36 am (UTC)(link)Also on "When Thesauruses Attack", I once dropped a fic after reading the first paragraph because it was obvious they were substituting every single noun and adjective for "more intelligent" synonyms without either caring (or most likely knowing) that the use and meaning of the words was not identical. I can't remember any examples other than "proliferous panic" used in such a way that "proliferous" made absolutely no sense.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 02:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 02:16 am (UTC)(link)I do wonder if the narrator in Gnomon is an AI of some sort, programmed with a very precise and extensive vocabulary but without the social intelligence to know when or how to choose more common, accessible words.
On a different note, that's a very clever cover illo, and I like it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 02:45 am (UTC)(link)According to that urban legend, I should hear them again within 24 hours
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)