case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-05-06 03:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #4141 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4141 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #593.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Based on #5

(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
da

It really depends on the fandom. Especially the "problematic elements are eroticized rather than being sanitized" part, though that's becoming more and more of a problem across the board.

Re: Based on #5

(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
But it also seems like one of the most commonplace, normalized sets of kinks

I mean, for Pete's sake, there's multiple billion-dollar multimedia franchises that fall into that category

Re: Based on #5

(Anonymous) 2018-05-06 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
If what you're looking for is specifically 50SoG badly-written pseudo-BDSM porn, maybe.

But if what you're looking for is a pairing you like in a fandom you enjoy where we're not pretending it's not incest (to pick a completely arbitrary example), that doesn't really scratch the itch, does it?

Re: Based on #5

(Anonymous) 2018-05-07 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
^^^THIS. Thank you.