Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-05-21 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #4156 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4156 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #595.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-05-23 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)And I'm honestly really tired of the wink-wink nudge-nudge 'we're going to use a harmful trope but mention that we know it sucks, that makes it fine to still basically use it whole cloth, right?' that a lot of pop culture tries to get away with these days. I felt the same way about all of Ant-man's "lmao isn't it funny and bad this movie isn't about Wasp" lampshading. It's not that edgy, it's not that funny, it just means the writers kinda knew this was a lazy trope that hurt people but couldn't bother to think of anything better. In Antman's case, I could maybe accept that studio mandates forced the writers' hands, but I think deadpool had a lot more room to go out of the box.
Honestly the whole thing would bother me so much less if people stopped trying to defend it. It can be a good movie and still contain a lousy trope in a lousy form. It doesn't have to """not count""" somehow for deadpool to still be fun and worth seeing for lots of people.