case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-05-24 07:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #4159 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4159 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Safe, Michael C. Hall]


__________________________________________________



07.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #595.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-05-25 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
People miss the point of the bechdel test. Like it's not supposed to be a quality determiner or used as a bragging right. The test is literally the equivalent of I got a 60 out of a 100 that means I didn't fail!! like congrats on doing the bare minimum??

(Anonymous) 2018-05-25 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
IA but I also don't think that tagging a fic with it is necessarily using it for bragging rights

(Anonymous) 2018-05-25 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

I agree. People have a bit of a chip on their shoulder about it, though.

(Anonymous) 2018-05-25 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Considering how frequently fic doesn't do the bare minimum in this regard, it's actually useful to know if the two female characters in this ensemble fic ever interact in a way that doesn't revolve around the male characters.

(Anonymous) 2018-05-25 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
the "point of the bechdel test"? is that it's a one note joke in a comic that nobody cared about that some people decided to take seriously

(Anonymous) 2018-05-25 10:40 am (UTC)(link)
Personally, I much prefer the sexy lamp test.