Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-06-05 06:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #4171 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4171 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #597.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-06-05 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)I can see why people are pissed off at the implication that Pearl was never free from her owner. People liked the idea that Pearl broke off from her original owner and joined the rebellion. The fact that the rebellion was started and lead by her owner does suggest that Pearl wasn't rebelling purely out of free will.
Personally I think that since Pearl and Pink Diamond conspired together to rebel, it's not too bad. I think they fed each other's ideas.
That being said, if a rebellion had actually been started by a non-Diamond gem (like a Bismuth, a Peridot, etc) I don't think Pearl would have joined the rebellion, because she loved Pink Diamond so much.
Or did she love Pink Diamond because of what the rebellion awakened in her? And she would have fallen in love with a different gem if that gem had the personality of the Rose Quartz persona she fell in love with?
I don't know, I'm thinking myself in circles. In any case I'm not throwing my hat into the ring until we see more of Pearl's backstory.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-06-07 08:09 am (UTC)(link)