[ SECRET POST #4171 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4171 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #597.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make!

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Hmm, well, so far canonically no other dragon species has had these huge species dimorphism. The males and females looked exactly the same and were pretty colors that didn't depend on sex. (Stormfly being blue for instance.) So, unless this White Fury is a subspecies of the Night Fury, this is completely out of character for all the other dragons we've seen. To me, it's a baffling design choice.

Fans of the series are upset about the design. Really upset, like majorly pissed upset. They're expressing their upset, people who may like the design feel attacked and need/want to defend the way they like it.

If Dreamworks were truly worried about not being able to tell her apart from Toothless, they could have made her bigger, made her another shade of black (Toothless is pretty flat grey black), they could have given her an 'oily sheen' of greens, blues, pinks and purples. But, she's white and sparkly and that just ticks all the stereotypical "Female character" check boxes that are so common in media. She also has less head things, the way she stands she looks like she has "breasts" and her claws are smaller. She has "eyeshadow" for goodness sake.

Hell, they could have called her an albino, kept the scaly appearance and made her pink like a Hippo or a Dolphin but they went white, sparkly and smooth.

We simply don't have enough information. And defenders of Dreamworks are trying to justify it because it's Dreamworks, not Disney, and we should TRUST Dreamworks not to pander to this gender stuff. So they're saying there has to be a reason. Some have gone as far to say executive meddling. People simply want to have faith that the creative team behind HTTYD that has managed SO FAR to be really progressive, wouldn't take this HUGE step back in terms of gendered animations of people and animals.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make!

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know why anyone expects DW to be progressive in this matter. It's a silly gendered trope, but it's not exactly offensive. There's no reason to expect a kids movie like HTTYD to break every mold instead of following the trope. It's not that deep.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make!

[(Anonymous)]

is there any info available about the new dragon? if it's revealed that it came from a snowy/cold region, then that would at least justify the coloration.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make!

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, the entire point of a Night Fury is that they... Don't stand out against the night sky, so her being white is a huge flaw in that. How does she hunt?