[ SECRET POST #4175 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4175 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #598.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

03. https://i.imgur.com/SV2vQiF.png

[(Anonymous)]

This secret seems weird but I'm too lazy to try to figure out why exactly

[(Anonymous)]

To me it's because all of the things listed aren't that wild.

[(Anonymous)]

And also some of them seem more like bad things that happened to her, and not her being a wild and crazy party girl

like the bit about Weinstein

[(Anonymous)]

Well, she could be the next Queen Elizabeth (QE is reported to have been quite... active in her bed in the 40s and 50s). :P

[(Anonymous)]

And Princess Margaret is supposed to have had an even wilder past.

[(Anonymous)]

I think that everything in this secret was already done by a royal, way before Meghan joined the family (other than the Harvey Weinstein bit. I don't think any of them had sex with him XD) She's not bringing any wildness that hasn't already been covered up.

[(Anonymous)]

Which British royal worked as an escort?

[cbrachyrhynchos]

One of the reasons why the Madness of King George was such a big deal was because the Prince was notorious for fucking and spending money. I think the latter was the bigger scandal because the Monarchy was "too big to fail" and parliament bailed him out multiple times.

You don't know much about Harry, do you?

[(Anonymous)]

If you think she's the wild child, I mean.

Re: You don't know much about Harry, do you?

[(Anonymous)]

MTE

A match made in... well, not necessarily heaven, lol.

Re: You don't know much about Harry, do you?

[(Anonymous)]

Harry's worked as an escort and fucked Harvey Weinstein, too? But seriously, pretty sure op isn't counting Harry because he's part of the royal family, he hasn't infiltrated it.

Re: You don't know much about Harry, do you?

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

But, that's the point, they already have one. Why would she need to infiltrate the 'prim and proper' royal family if it's not really that prim and proper?

And Harry does have naked pictures out there. He once went to a "Colonial and Native" themed costume party wearing a Nazi German Afrika Korps uniform with a swastika armband. He smoked pot and drank underage. He's gotten into scuffles with photographers. He's been accused of cheating at school, animal cruelty, and using racial slurs.

[(Anonymous)]

Yawn. Look up Prince Andrew's exes sometime.

[(Anonymous)]

can’t stand her because she’s a user and social climber. would have loved to see the royals “infiltrated” by a mixed-race american divorcee but it won’t last once she realizes the attention isn’t always for her and she can’t show off all the time. also bugs me when people call them “princess kate” and “princess meghan,” neither of them will ever actually be called that.

[(Anonymous)]

The Royals have basically struck gold considering how crazy the media is pushing Kate and Meghan. I have had to block tags about the royals on Tumblr because people are fangirling over 'actual princess meghan markle'. FFS.

[lovedforaday]

also bugs me when people call them “princess kate” and “princess meghan,” neither of them will ever actually be called that.

Absolutely no one gives a fuck besides the most obsessed Royal watchers.

can’t stand her because she’s a user and social climber.

She's the bad one, not Harry the sucker who fell for her con, right? Can't find it in me to be outraged she supposedly tricked her way into the British royal family.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I think you are making a mistake by assuming the Royals are as prudish and judgmental as the pearl-clutches on the I ternet, OP. As someone poi Ted put above, look up Princess Margaret sometime. The Queen probably thinks Meghan is just fine.

All that and...

[(Anonymous)]

She'll still live better than almost every single person on earth now. I'd take a few hits to my reputation in mainstream media in exchange for that, especially if my royalty status would protect me from any consequence of it anyway.