case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-06-14 06:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #4180 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4180 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Murdoch Mysteries]



__________________________________________________



02.
[Laurie R. King, Mary Russell mysteries]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Stargate SG-1]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Banner Saga 2]



__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #598.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-06-15 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes the author is trying to write about a complicated situation, and putting different arguments in the mouths of different characters so the reader can learn about all of them and, possibly, make their own value judgements from there.

Not all fiction is: "You should think this/agree with me or you're a Bad Person."

(Anonymous) 2018-06-15 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
But this is itself also something that you evaluate and critically interpret. Like. This doesn't really disagree with anything that OP's saying?

(Anonymous) 2018-06-15 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
True. I suppose I was just putting out another example of why authorial approval might be unclear.