case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-07-02 06:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #4198 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4198 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #601.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-03 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
This is the first I've heard of this (and it looks like it passed?). It sounds really insane. "Online platforms will have to pay for a license to link out to news publishers..." What? I get the point about supporting news institutions, but considering how often I come across links to articles behind the NYT paywall or see adds on news sites when I supposedly have add-blocker turned on, I'm not convinced those institutions are unable to get money out of people following links.